All manuscripts submitted to Future Visions Journal are subject to a multi-stage evaluation process in accordance with the principles of scholarly publishing. Submissions to the journal are first reviewed by the editorial board. At this stage, manuscripts are assessed in terms of their suitability for the journal’s aims and scope, compliance with academic writing standards, and adherence to fundamental ethical principles. Manuscripts that successfully pass the preliminary review are then forwarded to the peer-review process.

The peer-review process is conducted on the basis of impartiality and confidentiality. Within this framework, manuscripts are sent to at least two independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. During the evaluation process, the identities of both authors and reviewers are kept confidential in order to preserve scientific objectivity. Reviewers examine manuscripts in detail with regard to originality, methodological adequacy, theoretical framework, consistency of findings, and contribution to the literature.

Based on the reviewers’ reports, manuscripts may be accepted, returned for revision, or rejected. For manuscripts requiring revision, authors are expected to make the necessary amendments by taking the reviewers’ comments into consideration. Revised manuscripts may be submitted to a further round of peer review where deemed necessary. The final publication decision is made in light of the editorial assessment and reviewer reports.

Future Visions Journal adopts academic ethics, transparency, and scientific quality as fundamental principles at every stage of the evaluation process. The journal aims to ensure that published studies are original, reliable, and capable of making a meaningful contribution to the scholarly literature.